Skip to content
AidData logo

Overview

Chinese Communist Party donates computers, office equipment to the Peruvian Aprista Party

Commitments (Constant USD, 2023)$34,355
Commitment Year•2008Country of Activity•PeruDirect Recipient Country of Incorporation•PeruSector•CommunicationsFlow Type•Grant

Status

Project lifecycle

Completion

Pipeline: PledgePipeline: CommitmentImplementationCompletion

Timeline

Key dates

Commitment date
Jan 1, 2008
Start (actual)
Feb 18, 2008
End (actual)
Feb 18, 2008

Geospatial footprint

Map overview

Visualizes the AidData-provided feature geometry for this project.

Loading map…

The ceremony handing over the office equipment took place at the headquarters of the Aprista Party. More detailed locational information can be found at: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721087060

Stakeholders

Organizations involved in projects and activities supported by financial and in-kind transfers from Chinese government and state-owned entities

Funding agencies

Government Agencies

  • Chinese Communist Party

Receiving agencies

Miscellaneous Agency Types

  • Peruvian Aprista Party (APRA)

Loan desecription

Chinese Communist Party donates computers, office equipment to the Peruvian Aprista Party

Narrative

Full Description

Project narrative

On February 18, 2008, a handover ceremony was held for the Chinese Communist Party's China's donation of office equipment valued at about S/.71,329.82 to the Peruvian Aprista Party (APRA). Ambassador Gao Zhengyue was present at the ceremony. The supplies were designated as for educational purposes and included, among other things, 32-inch televisions, camcorders, DVD players, 10 computers, photocopiers, printers, professional sound equipment.

Staff comments

El Comercio records the computers to be valued at S/.71,329.82 (about 32,015 USD), quoting the Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales/National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE). The state official news agency Andina and a separate social media source report the grant to be worth 90,000 USD/almost 100,000 USD. Because it is able to provide a more specific number, because it quotes an official government agency, and because it is the more conservative estimate, the former number has been used.