Skip to content

Overview

China Provides Technical Support to Parliament Building in Lilongwe (Linked to Record ID#52327)

Commitments (Constant USD, 2023)$1,888,469
Commitment Year2015Country of ActivityMalawiDirect Recipient Country of IncorporationMalawiSectorIndustry, Mining, ConstructionFlow TypeGrant

Status

Project lifecycle

Pipeline: Commitment

Pipeline: PledgePipeline: CommitmentImplementationCompletion

Timeline

Key dates

Commitment date
Jun 2, 2015

Geospatial footprint

Map overview

Visualizes the AidData-provided feature geometry for this project.

Loading map…

More detailed locational information can be found at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6765701287 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12359795

Stakeholders

Organizations involved in projects and activities supported by financial and in-kind transfers from Chinese government and state-owned entities

Funding agencies

Government Agencies

  • Unspecified Chinese Government Institution

Receiving agencies

Government Agencies

  • Government of Malawi

Loan desecription

China Provides Technical Support to Parliament Building in Lilongwe (Linked to Record ID#52327)

Narrative

Full Description

Project narrative

June 2nd, 2015, China and Malawi signed for a third technical cooperation on the Parliament Building in Lilongwe. This third phase of technical cooperation will be for a period of two years and will cost MK 900 million. This cooperation means that the Government of China will provide maintenance and technical support to the parliament building which was also constructed by the Chinese themselves. The Chinese government will provide a team of seven technical experts to Malawi to support the Malawi Parliament. Minister of Finance, Economic Planning and Development, Dr Goodall Gondwe and Chinese Ambassador to Malawi Zhang Qingyang were present at the signing of the agreement. Linked to Record ID#52327 (which covers China training local Malawi technicians for maintenance of the Parliament Building).

Staff comments

Intent coded as development but the article was vague (Stage 2 coded flow class as ODA-like as a result of this). Project was scheduled to be completed by mid-2017, but Stage 2 could not confirm this. Intent coded as development but the article was vague (Stage 2 coded flow class as ODA-like as a result of this). Project was scheduled to be completed by mid-2017, but Stage 2 could not confirm this.