Skip to content

Overview

Chinese government provides USD 5 million grant to Kosrae State (Micronesia) to fund road improvements

Commitments (Constant USD, 2023)$5,158,669
Commitment Year2020Country of ActivityMicronesiaDirect Recipient Country of IncorporationMicronesiaSectorTransport And StorageFlow TypeGrant

Status

Project lifecycle

Pipeline: Commitment

Pipeline: PledgePipeline: CommitmentImplementationCompletion

Timeline

Key dates

Commitment date
Mar 11, 2020

Geospatial footprint

Map overview

Visualizes the AidData-provided feature geometry for this project.

Loading map…

This project involved dispersing a grant to the Kosrae State. For more detailed locational information, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3819480#map=10/5.3167/162.9673.

Stakeholders

Organizations involved in projects and activities supported by financial and in-kind transfers from Chinese government and state-owned entities

Funding agencies

Government Agencies

  • Unspecified Chinese Government Institution

Receiving agencies

Government Agencies

  • Government of Kosrae State of Micronesia
  • Government of Micronesia, Federated States of

Loan desecription

Chinese government provides USD 5 million grant to Kosrae State (Micronesia) to fund road improvements

Narrative

Full Description

Project narrative

On March 11, 2020, the 21st Congress of the Federated States of Micronesia approved a resolution (C.R. No. 21-128, C.D. 1) allocating USD 5 million in grant funds - previously committed by the Chinese government - to the Kosrae State for road improvements. Per the resolution, more than USD 5 million in Chinese government grants for road improvement projects had previously been allocated to Kosrae on an unspecified date. However, the project in Kosrae for which these funds were allocated "was never consummated or implemented." The specific road improvement project(s) to be financed via the USD 5 million allocated in March 2020 are unknown. It is also unknown whether the funds were committed via one large grant from the Chinese government, or via multiple grants with discretionary elements.

Staff comments

1. It is unknown if the project that captures the original commitment of the funds is already captured in AidData's dataset. This issue warrants further investigation. 2. This project may be funded via one or several Economic and Technical Cooperation Agreements (ETCA). This is for several reasons. First, the resolution itself references "grants" (plural) from the Chinese government that are being pulled from. Second, grants that are unallocated or partially allocated when committed, but later allocated to specific infrastructure projects, are a common financing mechanism associated with ETCAs. Third, there are several ETCAs that were signed by FSM and China for which no evidence about their subsequent allocation exists. However, there is no direct evidence linking this project to a particular ETCA. This issue warrants further investigation. 3. There is a risk that the grant captured in this project is being double counted if the original grant from the Chinese government is both (1) in the TUFF dataset and (2) not coded as an umbrella project. However, the chance that the funds referenced were granted via an ETCA (which AidData codes as umbrella projects) is fairly high. Further, if this projects was not funded via an ETCA or similar umbrella grant, AidData cannot identify a project in the TUFF database that is a uniquely likely candidate for the provision of the original funds: a non-ETCA grant which is related to infrastructure construction/sufficiently general to include infrastructure construction, but which is also unallocated to a specific project and/or allocated to a Kosrae State or infrastructure project that never took place. Record ID#69215 and ID#67602 are the only two projects that meet these criteria, and the former is a grant of only 250,000 USD from 2005, while the later is very likely an ETCA. As such, there is a sufficiently low chance that these grant funds are being double counted that this project can be recommended for aggregates. 4. Similar allocations of past unused grant funding can be found in Record ID#90074