Project ID: 98583

ICBC participates in USD $250 million syndicated loan to Saka Energi Indonesia

Commitment amount

$ 17285072.355314605

Adjusted commitment amount

$ 17285072.36

Constant 2021 USD

Summary

Funding agency [Type]

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) [State-owned Commercial Bank]

Recipient

Indonesia

Sector

Energy (Code: 230)

Flow type

Loan

Level of public liability

Private debt

Infrastructure

No

Category

Intent

Commercial (The next section lists the possible statuses.)

Commercial

Development

Representational

Mixed

Financial Flow Classification

OOF-like (The next section lists the possible statuses.)

Official Development Assistance

Other Official Flows

Vague (Official Finance)

Flows categorized based on OECD-DAC guidelines

Project lifecycle

Status

Pipeline: Commitment (The next section lists the possible statuses.)

Pledge

Commitment

Implementation

Completion

Suspended

Cancelled

Milestones

Commitment

2017-10-30

Description

In October 2017, ICBC and Bank of China participated in a $250 million USD syndicated loan to Saka Energi Indonesia, the upstream oil and gas arm of Indonesian state-owned Perusahaan Gas Negara. The deal was to sign in the first week of November 2017. ICBC and BOC each contributed $15 million USD to the loan syndicate as a lead arranger. Overseas Chinese Banking Corporation also received an allotment of $15 million. Among the six leads, BNP Paribas and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp retained the largest amounts, at $35m apiece. BNP split its portion between its Indonesian branch, which took $25m, and the Singapore branch. which will hold $10m. They were followed by Citi, at $30m, and DBS, Mizuho and HSBC, all of which took $25m each. The next title was lead manager, which was taken by five banks. These were Intesa Sanpaolo and Taipei Fubon Commercial Bank, at $7m each; CTBC Bank and State Bank of India, at $6m each; and Shanghai Commercial Bank and Savings Bank, at $4m. According to a media report, incoming banks were scaled back heavily; for example, Bank of China’s commitment was close to $80m but it ended up with just $15m. The interest rate margin for onshore lenders as 143bp, while for offshore banks it was 128bp over dollar Libor. The borrower has to pay withholding tax on any funds obtained from offshore lenders, hence the difference in margins.

Number of official sources

0

Number of total sources

1

Download the dataset

Details

Cofinanced

Yes

Cofinancing agencies [Type]

BNP Paribas S.A. [Private Sector]

Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation [Private Sector]

Citibank N.A. [Private Sector]

DBS Bank [Private Sector]

Mizuho Bank [Private Sector]

HSBC (Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation) [Private Sector]

Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation, Limited (OCBC Bank) [Private Sector]

Bank of China (BOC) [State-owned Commercial Bank]

Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A. [Private Sector]

Taipei Fubon Commercial Bank Co., Ltd. (Taipei Fubon Bank) [Private Sector]

CTBC Bank [Private Sector]

State Bank of India (SBI) [State-owned Bank]

The Shanghai Commercial & Savings Bank, Ltd. (SCSB) [Private Sector]

Direct receiving agencies [Type]

Saka Energi Indonesia [Private Sector]

Loan Details

Syndicated loan